
Does It Pay to Hold a Child Back?
Q. They
call it "academic redshirting," but in the olden days, it was called "holding a
child back" from kindergarten. Parents of boys tended to do it for sports
reasons, or if they felt their child wasn't mature enough for school. But is it
a good idea on down the road?
Probably not. Many parents and educators swear by
the practice of "academic redshirting" — waiting an extra year before
enrolling a child in kindergarten in hopes of giving the kid more confidence, greater
size or perhaps an academic edge.
But new research — including a U.S.
Department of Education study of 21,000 youngsters released in May — suggests
that the benefits are a mixed bag, both academically and socially. As often
happens with education techniques, redshirting appears to help some, harm
others, or have no effect at all. And within a few years, the net effect
becomes moot anyway.
The term "redshirting" comes
from athletics, in which some new college freshmen are kept out of competition
for a year to give them time to physically mature. How common is it? Recent
national studies estimate that 6% to 9% of children eligible for kindergarten
are redshirted each year. In some private schools and public-school districts, especially
in wealthier suburbs, as many as 50% of kids are held back an extra year before
starting kindergarten.
The practice may develop more
leadership and confidence in some children, but others may suffer academic
consequences. The federal study looked at the first-grade academic skills of
boys and girls who entered kindergarten in 1998. It found that the children who
had been redshirted had lower math knowledge and skills than first-graders who
started kindergarten on time.
According to Elizabeth Graue,
professor of curriculum and instruction at the University of Wisconsin at
Madison, an expert on redshirting, the practice can backfire, despite the best
intentions of parents.
Other studies found that children
who have been held back may develop more behavior problems by the middle-school
years, apparently because they feel alienated from their peer group. Redshirting
also is associated with a higher incidence of special ed on down the road. As
for the teacher's point of view, the practice contributes to the range of
diversity within a classroom, while many teachers say they are nearly
overwhelmed with the difficulty of meeting children's needs because of that
increasing diversity.
Repeating kindergarten, the
federal study also found, was an even more harmful practice. By the time they
reached first grade, kids who had repeated kindergarten appeared less likely to
possess specific math skills than the typical first-grader. In addition, they
were less likely to have developed reading skills, such as understanding words
in context.
It could be that if a child
had trouble mastering a subject the first time around, teaching the child with
the same technique won't help much a year later.
Other studies have looked at
the possible long-term influence of redshirting. A 2003 review of studies on
redshirting by Hermine H. Marshall, an emerita professor at San Francisco State
University, found that the effects of delaying kindergarten disappeared later
on in grade school.
By about third grade, she
reported, both positive and negative consequences tended to peter out.
Bottom line: don't delay
kindergarten entry just because your child has a summer birthday. Discuss your
child's readiness for kindergarten with preschool teachers. Find out what you
may need to do in the summer to develop your child's academic skills, ability
to follow directions and sit still, and so forth. Find out how many children
will be in the kindergarten class - the smaller, the better. Above all, be
positive and encouraging, and your child will flourish.
Homework: See
http://www.kidsource.com/education/red.shirting.html
Copyright 2006 • Susan
Darst Williams, www.DailySusan.com, is a writer, wife and mother of four who lives at the base
of Mount Laundry, Neb.