Go Big Ed - Nebraska #1 in Education  
SEARCH: 
    
PRINT 
  By Susan Darst Williams
MISSION  |   AUTHOR BIO  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT
Hall of Fame
Controversies
Parental Involvement
Public Policy
Achievement Gap
Learning Community
Cost-Effectiveness
Spending Cuts
School Choice
Government
Politics
School Boards
Private Schooling
Homeschooling
Rural Issues
Business
Community
A+ Ideas

Survey

Parent Homework
Public Policy Briefs
In the Unicameral
In the Courts
Ed Vocab
School Contacts
ParentAdvocates.org

Affiliated with the Education Consumers Clearinghouse
Home Email a Friend Site Map
Show 'N' Tell for Parents        < Previous        Next >

 

Are Science Labs Up to Snuff?

 

Q. With all the exciting things going on in science right now, and constant demands for improved science education, surely the science labs in our public schools are really high-tech and the best in the world. True?

 

            Not really. According to a report by the National Research Council, the typical high school science lab is an isolated add-on that's not well-integrated into the curriculum. It is thought that this is because of limited funding, large class sizes and a pervasive lack of consensus about what science education is really all about.

            Consequently, according to the report, the corresponding science classes lack clear goals, block effective student discussions, and fail to link scientific methods in students' minds with the building of a knowledge base integral to preparing for a career in a scientific field.

            There are questions about teacher qualifications, time management, and the scope and sequence of what kinds of science are taught in what order.

            The council, which advises government officials about science and engineering, says that too many science teachers aren't prepared very well to run science learning labs. They say the quality and availability of scientific equipment varies widely from school to school, and is often antiquated and of little utility.

            Another criticism: state assessments don't measure scientific lab skills even though those skills are crucial to building science literacy and our next generation of scientists.

            "For literally 150 years, laboratories have been the sacred cows of science education," said Susan Singer, chairwoman of the committee that wrote the report and professor of biology at Carleton College. "Nobody has stopped to question what the value added is, or how we should go about using labs to improve learning. We haven't asked the right questions."
            The study, "America's Lab Report," was financed by the independent National Science Foundation.

Homework: For more about science education, see the National Research Council, http://www.nationalacademies.org/nrc/ and the National Science Teachers Association, http://www.nsta.org

 

 

Copyright 2005 • Susan Darst Williams, www.DailySusan.com, is a writer, wife and mother of four who lives at the base of Mount Laundry, Neb.

Show 'N' Tell for Parents        < Previous        Next >
^ return to top ^
Individuals: read and share these features freely!

Publications: please contact GoBigEd to arrange for reprint rights to these copyrighted news stories and features.
   

Mini-Grants

Educational
Advice Columns

Enrichment Ideas

Glimpses of God

Humor Blog
© GoBigEd.com, All Rights Reserved.
Website created by Web Solutions Omaha