Go Big Ed - Nebraska #1 in Education  
SEARCH: 
    
PRINT 
  By Susan Darst Williams
MISSION  |   AUTHOR BIO  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT
Hall of Fame
Controversies
Parental Involvement
Public Policy
Achievement Gap
Learning Community
Cost-Effectiveness
Spending Cuts
School Choice
Government
Politics
School Boards
Private Schooling
Homeschooling
Rural Issues
Business
Community
A+ Ideas

Survey

Parent Homework
Public Policy Briefs
In the Unicameral
In the Courts
Ed Vocab
School Contacts
ParentAdvocates.org

Affiliated with the Education Consumers Clearinghouse
Home Email a Friend Site Map
Show 'N' Tell for Parents        < Previous        Next >

 

 

Ten Myths About Whole Math

 

Q. Is there broad consensus on how we're teaching math these days?

 

No, there are two opposing camps. The "whole math" methods developed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), is under fire from  New York City HOLD (Honest Open Logical Decisions), which favors a more traditional approach.

The latter is made up of mathematicians and scientists, K-12 teachers of mathematics, educational researchers, and parents nationwide. They claim to have defined 10 myths about math education that form the basis for the NCTM's standards, which they vigorously oppose. To capsulize whole math vs. traditional math:

-- Only what students discover for themselves is truly learned. No; kids need direct instruction of math concepts.

            -- Children should invent their own ways of doing math. No; standard skills such as long division are crucial to higher-level math and must be taught explicitly.

            -- Children need problem-solving rather than "drill and kill." No; there's no getting around the need for mastery of basic skills in order to do the conceptual type math.

            -- NCTM math is better for learning-disabled children. No; they need structure.

            -- NCTM math is better for disadvantaged children. No; their teachers disagree.

            -- Calculator use is a great way to build math ability. No; the better the math student on the secondary level, the less calculators were used before sixth grade.

            -- Foreign countries beat us on math tests because they "cherry-pick" their top students to go against our entire student bodies. No; participants are randomly selected.

            -- Math should be taught "in context," with stories. No; they're a good tool but shouldn't take center stage, or students won't have sufficient practical application.

            -- NCTM methods are what higher-performing countries use. No; math class in Singapore and Japan is like the skills-based methods the grassroots group proposes.

            -- Research shows NCTM is effective. No; that "research" is self-serving, opinionated and far from conclusive; it looks effective because assessments have been modified to fit the NCTM method, instead of what kids really should know and be able to do.

 

Homework: Read documentation at www.nychold.com/myths-050504.html

 

 

Copyright 2005 • Susan Darst Williams, www.DailySusan.com, is a writer, wife and mother of four who lives at the base of Mount Laundry, Neb.

Show 'N' Tell for Parents        < Previous        Next >
^ return to top ^
Individuals: read and share these features freely!

Publications: please contact GoBigEd to arrange for reprint rights to these copyrighted news stories and features.
   

Mini-Grants

Educational
Advice Columns

Enrichment Ideas

Glimpses of God

Humor Blog
© GoBigEd.com, All Rights Reserved.
Website created by Web Solutions Omaha