GoBigEd focuses on three goals:
better reading,
school choice,
and cutting school spending.
Here's how:
- Go Big Read.
The focus needs to be on effective reading instruction. That's
how to increase standardized test scores, reduce the outrageous percentage of
minority and low-income students who drop out of school, reverse the explosion
in unnecessary special education costs, cut property taxes and sales/income
taxes, and improve overall learning performance in all subjects statewide.
We need to reform school funding and
accreditation rules so that phonics-only
reading instruction is the primary method of choice in K-3 classrooms. All
it takes is 20 minutes a day, but almost no Nebraska grade schools are teaching
this time-tested, classic methodology at present. That's because very few
educators have been taught it themselves.
Once a child can decode fluently, he or she is ready for
all the other language activities, and shouldn't be held back and grouped with
struggling or beginning decoders. That can be achieved in class with "testing
out" opportunities, followed by ability grouping and differentiated instruction
very similar to what's now going on in early primary classrooms.
It would take about one week and $200 apiece for every K-3
teacher in the state to learn systematic, intensive, explicit phonics. It would
be the best investment in staff development any district has ever made, because
it would produce an immediate, striking improvement in reading and writing
ability in our students.
An important component of this plan
is a public education campaign to
equip parents and child-care providers to carry out successful pre-reading
activities with preschoolers at home and in child-care settings, and then
effectively support teachers once the children get into formal reading
instruction at school.
Another key to reading achievement
is to reduce class sizes. We can obtain
the money for this from judicious non-classroom cuts, such as in #3, below.
Also needed are incentives for good teachers: through the grades, give financial
rewards to teachers whose students perform better on reading tests than the
year before - "value-added assessment."
Set a goal for Nebraska students to test 1st in the nation on the reading
portion of the ACT among states with at least 50% participation by 2012.
This year, Nebraska ranks behind Iowa, Minnesota, Wyoming, Montana, Kansas and
Utah in that measurement. With phonics, we could be No. 1.
- Go Big Choice.
Where it is available, private
education is better and cheaper than public education in Nebraska. Dropout
rates are much lower in private schools, attendance is much higher, and the
rate of college admissions is nearly 100% from the state's private high
schools. Private schools would provide much-needed competition for the public
schools if they could gain a level playing field, financially. The public
schools would have to improve to compete for students. And that would help
everybody.
Almost all private schools in the state charge tuition of less than $3,500, while the average public school district has costs in
excess of $8,000 per pupil, and that's just for operating expenses - not
counting debt service and so on, which can drive the actual tax dollars spent
per pupil sky-high.
But even though private schools are so much cheaper, and
demonstrably better, low-income
students, and those in our most rural areas, have no access to private school.
Either their families can't afford the tuition, or the economics are too tough
for private schools to form.
School choice is long
overdue in Nebraska,
and it can be offered to Nebraskans without hurting public schools. In fact, it
can help them. Citizens are already hard at work on a school choice plan that
would go a long way toward equalizing
educational opportunity in this state, putting the K-12 purchasing power in the hands of parents,
protecting our multi-billion dollar investment
in our public schools, and providing
tax cuts as well.
In addition, we should be offering corporations and wealthy
individuals dollar-for-dollar tax
credits for donations to tuition assistance funds such as the Children's
Scholarship Fund. Keep those dollars circulating in Nebraska's economy and give
our state's extraordinarily generous philanthropists and retirees a chance to
help our most vulnerable citizens grow up to have "The Good Life" because of
their great educations.
Another innovation is "school
choice for school boards." They should be allowed to hire whoever they want
in top administrative jobs such as superintendents and principals. Our elected
officials need more freedom to open up school management responsibility to the
many outstanding candidates who just don't happen to have teaching
certificates, in order to bring innovation and cost-efficiency to schools.
- Go Big Tax Cuts.
School choice in Nebraska would go a long way
toward reducing school spending and cutting taxes, since the average cost per
pupil in a public school in Nebraska is $8,000 for operating expenses alone.
Most of that wouldn't be necessary if the child is being educated in a private
school under the school choice system, since the voucher would be for only a
fraction of the $8,000.
However, we need to dig much deeper. School spending has
been increasing at such an alarming rate, and test scores of inner-city and minority
children have been so much worse than suburban white children for so many years,
that a grand-jury investigation is
in order. The racial achievement gap makes it appear that we have systemic
civil-rights violations in this state that have persisted for decades. We need
data to understand how Nebraska's school systems could have been delivering
such an apparently unequal education for so long. The only way to get to the
bottom of this, and ensure improvement, appears to be through the court system,
perhaps the federal courts. Yes, it's time to "make a federal case out of it."
Our kids and our future are that important.
Such an investigation would naturally look carefully at
sources and uses of funds and would no doubt expose a myriad of cost-cutting opportunities that would
in turn provide room for significant tax cuts.
Nebraska also should create the position of Inspector General for Education in the
State Auditor's Office to direct performance and forensic audits over the more
than $2 billion in state aid that is distributed annually and, as of now, is audited
only on a pro forma basis. These more in-depth audits are an important tool for
uncovering waste, fraud, mismanagement, embezzlement, nepotism, no-bid
contracts, and many other ways that tax dollars are abused in school systems.
We really need to dissolve
the Educational Service Units; reform educator retirement and other benefit plans and compensation programs; encourage
school boards to appoint citizen audit
committees to help them set policies with tighter fiscal controls; require
districts to publish their check
registers online; shrink bureaucracy with privatization incentives in non-classroom school budget areas such
as transportation; and withdraw from
federal funding altogether, so that Nebraska has the most high-achieving, cost-effective,
accountable, locally-controlled, performance-driven, and taxpayer-friendly
educational system in the country.